Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Welcome to the Charlie Tango DX Group. The home of ALL things Radio - CB, 11m DX, Amateur, PMR446, PLD, Network and Data. We welcome all radio enthusiasts of all knowledge levels. Join today and claim your own unique World Famous CT Call-sign
Call Sign : 19-CT-024 Posts : 103 Times Thanked : 4 Join date : 2020-05-21 QTH or Location : Steenwijk, JO32bs Equipment Used : Dynascan AT5555,President Lincoln I, President Bill Asc, KL-200P, T2LT, 5/8 Gainmaster, Emperor LA-50 Age : 64
Subject: DEWD UR0GT? Sun Oct 25, 2020 3:32 pm
In another thread i advised building a DEWD because i have modelled one in CocoaNEC and it gives (in theory) an SWR of 1.1:1 between 26.5 and 28.5 Mhz. I find that almost to good to be true, so my question is there anyone who used this antenna and can confirm that theory is right in practice? Before i start building me one?
73
Victor CT Directors
Call Sign : 26-CT-3228 / M7VIC Posts : 4648 Times Thanked : 298 Join date : 2019-11-10 QTH or Location : Bedford Equipment Used : Various
Subject: Re: DEWD UR0GT? Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:07 am
Hi Karel,
That's probably part of the 'fun' of antenna experimentation, modelling AND building.
I always remember with antennas that 'you don't get something for nothing' so would expect a DEWD to be a little bit down compared to a standard dipole.
Had a similar issue when reading up on terminated antennas, lots of theory, lots of modelling and when I did find those that had actually built them, quite conflicting results. In the end I had to physically build them myself to see the results first hand. Indeed they are as wide-banded as modelled, (SWR of 2:1 or less across the whole HF band!), but they stink in terms of performance compared to my fan dipole array. (Built a T2FD, a triple, a terminated loop and a Bonnie Crystal terminated butterfly).
Was it a waste of time? Depends on how you view it, I actually had fun building them and gained hands on experience.
So much so that I modified my dipole array to include zig-zag dipoles for 80m and 10/11m. With a matcher I can bring the low impedance up and now get all the bands of interest for me and much better so than a terminated affair. I can even squeeze a little 160m performance with the matcher and although not perfect, still gives me top band operation. Better than none at all
They say every antenna is a compromise, it's just a case of finding a compromise that fits your needs.
If a modelled antenna looks promising then maybe build one and see for yourself. If you're waiting for someone else to build one you could find yourself with a long wait and like me obtain conflicting results.
Enjoy your experiments.
All the best, Victor
karelgol Senior contributor
Call Sign : 19-CT-024 Posts : 103 Times Thanked : 4 Join date : 2020-05-21 QTH or Location : Steenwijk, JO32bs Equipment Used : Dynascan AT5555,President Lincoln I, President Bill Asc, KL-200P, T2LT, 5/8 Gainmaster, Emperor LA-50 Age : 64
Subject: Re: DEWD UR0GT? Tue Oct 27, 2020 4:54 pm
It wasn't so much about a waste of time, but about a waste of good aluminum And being almost not electronically but mechanically educated i try to keep the antenna as simple as possible. Thanks for commenting.
73
Victor CT Directors
Call Sign : 26-CT-3228 / M7VIC Posts : 4648 Times Thanked : 298 Join date : 2019-11-10 QTH or Location : Bedford Equipment Used : Various
Subject: Re: DEWD UR0GT? Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:30 pm
No worries Karel, it was in the spirit of offering help.
Have fun with your antenna work.
73
karelgol Senior contributor
Call Sign : 19-CT-024 Posts : 103 Times Thanked : 4 Join date : 2020-05-21 QTH or Location : Steenwijk, JO32bs Equipment Used : Dynascan AT5555,President Lincoln I, President Bill Asc, KL-200P, T2LT, 5/8 Gainmaster, Emperor LA-50 Age : 64
Subject: Re: DEWD UR0GT? Thu Oct 29, 2020 12:52 pm
So, tried another design. I'd describe that as a short(20cm) boom 2 element Yagi. 2Dbi extra max gain compared to the DEWD. SWR <1.1 between 27 and 28.5Mhz. Below 2 up to 29.5Mhz. And still simple to build. Thanks Victor for getting me thinking.