Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Welcome to the Charlie Tango DX Group. The home of ALL things Radio - CB, 11m DX, Amateur, PMR446, PLD, Network and Data. We welcome all radio enthusiasts of all knowledge levels. Join today and claim your own unique World Famous CT Call-sign
Starting December 1st - March 31st - 11m Winter Challenge, now taking names, come join us
Call Sign : 26-CT-3971 / 2E0LMI Posts : 1031 Times Thanked : 62 Join date : 2021-01-30 QTH or Location : Cirencester, Gloucestershire Equipment Used : Little radios, home-made antennas
Subject: The Great State Debate Mon Sep 25, 2023 1:35 pm
Embracing the nature of Charlie Tango "The home of ALL things Radio", just opening a fun discussion for anyone to join in with be that on CB, Amateur, other radio users, SWLs, or more than one of these if you play with many radio aspects.
Which US state(s) are you finding the hardest to get into your logbook?
Some states can be a difficult to get logged for many reasons, not just including distance, terrain, size, population density, and where you are located. Which are being the most troublesome for you? Maybe you are a big boy station or a very long time radio user and have worked them all many times, if so which do you have logged the least? If you only SWL the bands, which do you not hear or hear the least?
Most of our CT profiles show where we are located, but if yours does not do let know in your replies roughly where you are located, along with the radio platforms you use, as can make huge difference to the meaning of your reply. E.g. one of my nemesis states is South Dakota, I have only heard one station there on the ham bands since getting licenced and as far as I can see have no record of an 11m contact with anyone there ever. But if you live in that state or a nearby one, you might talk to people there every day.
Wonder if we will all come to the same conclusion for the hardest state to log...
Victor likes this post
Alan Pilot Major contributor
Call Sign : 163-CT-220...MW7TTA Posts : 2446 Times Thanked : 66 Join date : 2019-11-19 QTH or Location : Anglesey North Wales Equipment Used : Yaesu FT-991A,,Yaesu FTDX-10,,Icom ic-7300,,Anytone AT-D878UV PLUS",,LINCOLN II+. Age : 150
Subject: Re: The Great State Debate Mon Sep 25, 2023 2:29 pm
New Mexico was a hard one for me to get took me 18 months to get a station there that confirmed. Still only the one contact there and that was K5TA on 10m ft8 back in June. A m8 not far from me is still trying for Hawaii yet i have 14 contacts there. Strange how it works.
SangueG likes this post
SangueG Major contributor
Call Sign : 26-CT-3971 / 2E0LMI Posts : 1031 Times Thanked : 62 Join date : 2021-01-30 QTH or Location : Cirencester, Gloucestershire Equipment Used : Little radios, home-made antennas
Subject: Re: The Great State Debate Tue Sep 26, 2023 6:12 am
Well done with your 14 with Hawaii Alan. Just like your friend, I still don't have one with there yet, but have heard a couple.
I only have one ham contact to New Mexico too, K5HJA. 10m FT4, January this year, so that was 17 months for me. Pretty similar. Well we know there's at least 2 ham stations in that state
Anyone had any CB contacts into New Mexico state?
43CT016 Major contributor
Call Sign : 43-CT-016 Posts : 342 Times Thanked : 22 Join date : 2019-11-17 QTH or Location : Perth Equipment Used : iCom IC-7610/IC-9700
Subject: Re: The Great State Debate Tue Sep 26, 2023 10:39 am
Alaska and Hawaii are claimed to be the two most difficult...yet I have both whilst still lacking 15 or so others.
Alan Pilot Major contributor
Call Sign : 163-CT-220...MW7TTA Posts : 2446 Times Thanked : 66 Join date : 2019-11-19 QTH or Location : Anglesey North Wales Equipment Used : Yaesu FT-991A,,Yaesu FTDX-10,,Icom ic-7300,,Anytone AT-D878UV PLUS",,LINCOLN II+. Age : 150
Subject: Re: The Great State Debate Tue Sep 26, 2023 10:53 am
Alaska is a big jump for you Jeff. Had 61 contacts there but only 6 of them confirmed. Hate it when you get some ware and they don't confirm.
43CT016 Major contributor
Call Sign : 43-CT-016 Posts : 342 Times Thanked : 22 Join date : 2019-11-17 QTH or Location : Perth Equipment Used : iCom IC-7610/IC-9700
Subject: Re: The Great State Debate Tue Sep 26, 2023 10:56 am
Alan Pilot wrote:
Alaska is a big jump for you Jeff. Had 61 contacts there but only 6 of them confirmed. Hate it when you get some ware and they don't confirm.
Yes, only got that one ft8, not SSB.
With confirmations, I found the biggest difference i made was joining LOTW. My confirmation rate jumped substantially, especially with our American friends. I just link it into Log4OM and QRZ.com and have it all auto-update.
peewee norfolk Senior contributor
Call Sign : 26-CT-4879 / M7PCA Posts : 116 Times Thanked : 5 Join date : 2023-07-16 QTH or Location : North Walsham, JO02QU Equipment Used : binatone 5*,alinco dx10 135,sirio4000,silver rod,G5RV,beofeng 17 pro max, X30 duel 2m/70cm,full size G5RV, TS120v,soon ft991a !!!!! Age : 56
Subject: Re: The Great State Debate Tue Sep 26, 2023 12:59 pm
Had nova scota, and Mexico City on 27.505 usb (CB) But struggle with the rest of USA at the moment as to many drown out my low power but I'll keep trying
SangueG Major contributor
Call Sign : 26-CT-3971 / 2E0LMI Posts : 1031 Times Thanked : 62 Join date : 2021-01-30 QTH or Location : Cirencester, Gloucestershire Equipment Used : Little radios, home-made antennas
Subject: Re: The Great State Debate Wed Sep 27, 2023 8:32 am
peewee norfolk wrote:
Had nova scota, and Mexico City on 27.505 usb (CB) But struggle with the rest of USA at the moment as to many drown out my low power but I'll keep trying
Well done on those contacts. You've made it to Nova Scotia and so it's only a matter of time I am sure before you hit the relatively close by US states to it. Keep at it, don't need a lot of power when the conditions align
Jeff, had a play with Google Earth line measuring, was quite interesting seeing the distances between parts of Australia and the US. I had in my mind the two countries were generally closer than they actually were. I only have two contacts into Alaska and both using digital, one FT8 and one FT4.. Alan, you've done amazing in such a relatively short time to get that many!
13oots2 Major contributor
Call Sign : 26-CT-4694, M7EUS Posts : 227 Times Thanked : 14 Join date : 2022-11-13 QTH or Location : Dorchester UK Equipment Used : Yaesu FT950, 66FT Endfed Antenna, Various Other Bits and Pieces Age : 56
Subject: Re: The Great State Debate Wed Sep 27, 2023 9:14 am
With my indoor antenna the States is quite difficult for me, although most are East coast I have had one West coast.
Victor and Alan Pilot like this post
Victor CT Directors
Call Sign : 26-CT-3228 / M7VIC Posts : 5268 Times Thanked : 339 Join date : 2019-11-10 QTH or Location : Bedford Equipment Used : Various
Subject: Re: The Great State Debate Wed Sep 27, 2023 1:13 pm
Same here Mark my friend, but without our indoor antennas what would the alternative be?
You ought to be congratulating yourself on how much you achieve with it. (I know I do with mine!)
Worth waiting it out as I'd only got East coast stuff but then bagged Texas & Oklahoma one after the other more recently and both QRZ confirmed. I have had as far as Washington on the West coast but no confirmation came forth, then again you will eventually run across someone using QRZ. (Florida is my most common contact but not one single confirmation as of yet!)
Stick with it mate and more importantly, enjoy yourself.
43CT016 Major contributor
Call Sign : 43-CT-016 Posts : 342 Times Thanked : 22 Join date : 2019-11-17 QTH or Location : Perth Equipment Used : iCom IC-7610/IC-9700
Subject: Re: The Great State Debate Wed Sep 27, 2023 1:28 pm
Victor wrote:
I have had as far as Washington on the West coast but no confirmation came forth, then again you will eventually run across someone using QRZ. (Florida is my most common contact but not one single confirmation as of yet!)
If you don’t already, signup for LOTW. My confirmation rate on QRZ almost doubled when I did, and QRZ counts those confirmations for their awards too.
Victor likes this post
Cozzmik 10 + Year member
Call Sign : 26-CT-465/OP-465/FB-012 Posts : 194 Times Thanked : 8 Join date : 2020-04-12 QTH or Location : Kent Equipment Used : Kenwood ts570dg/Yaesu ft450d/Rm-kl400/Sirio 4000 Age : 53
Subject: Re: The Great State Debate Wed Sep 27, 2023 3:42 pm
I heard a operator today say "mother nature has her long skirt on but she may give you a little peak if you play your cards right" which made me laugh... California has been difficult for me over the last 30 years with only one contact made,yet Alaska long path using my Yagi has been achieved a few times...
I remember a guy and his wife using a 16 element long boom antenna on a 60 ft mast working the world but still needing mother nature's help.
If it was too easy where is the fun...
Victor and SangueG like this post
Victor CT Directors
Call Sign : 26-CT-3228 / M7VIC Posts : 5268 Times Thanked : 339 Join date : 2019-11-10 QTH or Location : Bedford Equipment Used : Various
Subject: Re: The Great State Debate Wed Sep 27, 2023 4:51 pm
Ha! Ha!
Haven't heard that expression in years Sam! "Showing her cleavage" was one for when the skip was really rolling in grabbing everyone's attention.
I agree wholeheartedly with you, if it was easy it wouldn't be half as much fun.
Cozzmik likes this post
Ivy Mike Major contributor
Call Sign : 26CT4113/G1HWY Posts : 389 Times Thanked : 10 Join date : 2021-05-16 QTH or Location : IO90uv Equipment Used : ICOM radios/antenna farm Age : 68
Subject: Re: The Great State Debate Sat Sep 30, 2023 7:58 am
Have worked all states apart from Delaware Oregon South Dakota Wyoming
Unconfirmed Alabama Colorado Idaho Kansas New Mexico
SangueG Major contributor
Call Sign : 26-CT-3971 / 2E0LMI Posts : 1031 Times Thanked : 62 Join date : 2021-01-30 QTH or Location : Cirencester, Gloucestershire Equipment Used : Little radios, home-made antennas
Subject: Re: The Great State Debate Sun Oct 01, 2023 6:37 am
As Sam detailed in the 11m conditions discussion, the upper HF bands were great for for the US yesterday. Only caught the tail end though as I was out busy for most of the day. Really pleased to get my first South Dakota in the log, that was K0SSD on 10m FT8 using the indoor delta loop and 10w.
That's 47 out 50 worked and confirmed now. Ones left are Hawaii (already mention in another post), Wyoming (as you Mike), and Nevada (which I tried for a good time yesterday, and failed). So going by who I have heard on air even if I haven't worked them, Wyoming is currently the hardest one for me. Anyone worked that one, and if so how many times?
Mark 13oots2, very well done on your US contacts with your indoor antenna. Keep at it. If you are on the right band at the right time when conditions are optimal, you will work more states. Promise.
Alan Pilot and Ivy Mike like this post
Ivy Mike Major contributor
Call Sign : 26CT4113/G1HWY Posts : 389 Times Thanked : 10 Join date : 2021-05-16 QTH or Location : IO90uv Equipment Used : ICOM radios/antenna farm Age : 68
Subject: Re: The Great State Debate Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:53 am
Seems I have Idaho, Alabama and Kansas confirmed on LOTW but not in QRZ. So only two unconfirmed of those worked.
Did not have a WAS account in LOTW but now set up.
Wyoming is the least populated state, may be that is why it is more difficult.
SangueG likes this post
Alan Pilot Major contributor
Call Sign : 163-CT-220...MW7TTA Posts : 2446 Times Thanked : 66 Join date : 2019-11-19 QTH or Location : Anglesey North Wales Equipment Used : Yaesu FT-991A,,Yaesu FTDX-10,,Icom ic-7300,,Anytone AT-D878UV PLUS",,LINCOLN II+. Age : 150
Subject: Re: The Great State Debate Sun Oct 01, 2023 10:44 am
Sorry again Neal. Wyoming 1 time on 30m confirmed. 1 time on 17. confirmed. 2 times on 70cm DMR confirmed but i don't count them. And none on any other band at all.